facts undesirable
v. 08:11:09
http://www.politblogger.net/fakten-unerwuenscht/
News from the Rechtsstaatsverstuemmlerin
V. 01.11.2009 V. 03/11/2009
facts undesirable
v. 08:11:09
http://www.politblogger.net/fakten-unerwuenscht/
The decision of the Higher Regional Court is clear as a and extremely gratifying refusal in the first place to the address Laufer and their alleged organization task force "to understand. With reference to Article 3 of the Constitution designates the OLG nuclear maturity claims for what they are: simply unconstitutional.
In legal and diplomatic manner at the same time criticizing the decision of first instance Family Court clearly. It is clear that neither youth nor the Official Family Court have sought ways to make the concrete circumstances of the parents and their families in Addis Ababa a picture. The Eruierung of the actual conditions was only in the first instance the attorney for the parents and then left again on appeal to the Court of Appeals . It must be stressed here that was the first attorney from the parents' opinions obtained from the German Embassy by the family court recognized not appreciated, although this opinion was already clear that there was for the child, Dinah never a threat.
The decision makes further clearly clear that not even by the youth office demands made against the parents with the Basic Law are compatible, because they, too, on the assumption a general suspicion based. Still applies in our law: a general suspicion against an ethnic group or against members of certain ethnic groups is not lawful. The OLG has been encouraging it clear that unconstitutional racial and ethnically offensive uE and demands as they represent Laufer including their so-called " prevention program" in our country have no place.
Laufer has tried to enforce their claims here not only in our view, aggressive and inhuman manner. It has also also repeatedly tried to make critics are screaming at their position (for example, editors of "Mona Lisa" (ZDF), Badische Zeitung, Süddeutsche Zeitung, etc. etc ... ... and the families themselves and their friends . As the Court of Appeals notified was runner has even tried to put pressure on the German Embassy in Addis Ababa.) .
Instead to face the open confrontation and discussion, Laufer has always tried to suppress criticism simply to put people under pressure.
positions that differ from theirs, are not tolerated by it and dealt with means of the power struggle instead of the discourse. But above all to have had contact with Dinah's family or even to know anything about this particular family, rushes it without ever continue to oppose the family and subject to the parents, the German Embassy and the appellate court, ( to favor never passed!) "danger of mutilation" for Dinah.
Here comes full circle to the previously drawn by us conceptual parallel to Robespierre and his " terrorist of the virtuous and good will . Laufer's overestimation of his own political position for them and their importance in connection with their uE fundamentalist
Laufer but will increase their agitation kaltschnäutzig great personal suffering of the attacked by her family to purchase. "Gooder" Laufer this family also brings in existential distress by the parents without any justifiable basic family forced an expensive court proceedings for which provides for our current legal system does for the cost of legal fees by a court or juvenile office, even if the parents prevail. In addition, Laufer has tried to bring the child's father intimidation by lawyers like to publish substantive criticism of their occurrence and their political positions on the web.
For us, it seems to go at running efforts primarily concerned to present themselves in public. As a "coronation " would be sure of their case has been recorded, " finally " so to be able to chalk up a success as Rüdiger Nehberg with the case through in the cause to a loss of custody ultimately to the Supreme Court was (The case that is being quoted by Laufer repeatedly has, after careful examination of the out the case for the withdrawal of parental authority, without the Federal Court decision has confirmed in any way the admissibility of the runner to be desired general suspicion).
"pitch" for Laufer, that she has just applied to migrants who are above suspicion. Dinah's family knows not to only defend itself but has (thanks to their good integration) also have many friends that keep them in these difficult situations. But luck for migrants in our country who continue using the current Appellate Court decision and its findings are better counteract such racist attacks can fight back!
for the Friends of the Family:
